Commit faf7ff6f authored by Franco Mele's avatar Franco Mele
Browse files

spiegazione qualità

parent 5de77560
The first quality rating is based on errors and goodness-of-fit:
CRITERI USATI NEI REPORT CHE PRECEDONO IL 2015:
The first quality rating is based on errors and goodness-of-fit:
Score
1.5 A. RMS < 0.45 sec and ERH <2.0 km and ERZ <4.0 km
0.5 B. RMS < 0.90 sec and ERH <5.0 km and ERZ <10.0 km
-0.5 C. RMS < 1.50 sec and ERH <10.0 km
-1.5 D. Worse than above
The second quality rating is based on station geometry:
-0.5 C. RMS < 1.50 sec and ERH <10.0 km
-1.5 D. Worse than above
The second quality rating is based on station geometry:
Score
3.0 A. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 90 and either DMIN < DEPTH or DMIN <10.0
1.0 B. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 135 and either DMIN < 2*DEPTH or DMIN <20
-1.0 C. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 180 and DMIN <100
-3.0 D. Worse than above
\ No newline at end of file
3.0 A. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 90 and either DMIN < DEPTH or DMIN <10.0
1.0 B. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 135 and either DMIN < 2*DEPTH or DMIN <20
-1.0 C. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 180 and DMIN <100
-3.0 D. Worse than above
# CRITERI ORIGINALI di Hypoinverse2000 adottati dal 2015
#
# The first quality rating is based on errors and goodness-of-fit:
#
# A. RMS < 0.15 sec and ERH <1.0 km and ERZ <2.0 km
# B. RMS < 0.30 sec and ERH <2.5 km and ERZ <5.0 km
# C. RMS < 0.50 sec and ERH <5.0 km
# D. Worse than above
#
# The second quality rating is based on station geometry:
#
# A. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 90 and either DMIN < DEPTH or DMIN <5.0
# B. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 135 and either DMIN < 2*DEPTH or DMIN <10
# C. NWR > 6 and MAXGAP < 180 and DMIN <100
# D. Worse than above
Invece di usare NWR, nel 2015 uso il numero totale di fasi
che però deve essere maggiore di 8.
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment